Current:Home > InvestJudge allows disabled voters in Wisconsin to electronically vote from home -AssetBase
Judge allows disabled voters in Wisconsin to electronically vote from home
View
Date:2025-04-25 21:29:31
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Local election officials in battleground state Wisconsin will be allowed to send absentee ballots to disabled voters electronically in November’s presidential election, a judge ruled Tuesday.
Dane County Circuit Judge Everett Mitchell issued a temporary injunction that allows voters who self-certify that they can’t read or mark a paper ballot without help to request absentee ballots electronically from local clerks. The voters can then cast their ballots at home using devices that help them read and write independently. They will still be required to mail the ballots back to the clerks or return them in person, the same as any other absentee voter in the state.
The injunction is part of a larger lawsuit that advocates for disabled voters filed in April. The plaintiffs argued in the filing that many people with disabilities can’t cast paper ballots without assistance, compromising their right to cast a secret ballot, and struggle to return ballots through the mail or in-person.
Any eligible voter can vote by paper absentee ballot in Wisconsin. Anyone could request an absentee ballot electronically until 2011, when then-Gov. Scott Walker signed a Republican-authored law that allowed only military and overseas voters to use that method.
Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat, opposes allowing disabled voters to request electronic absentee ballots. His lawyers argued during a hearing on Monday that state election officials don’t have time before November to train Wisconsin’s roughly 1,800 local clerks in how to handle electronic ballot requests from disabled voters and create ballots that can interact with the voters’ assistive devices. They warned the move would only create confusion and raise security risks.
The plaintiffs countered that an electronic ballot delivery system already exists for military and overseas voters and disabled voters deserve the same treatment. They also have a constitutional right to cast a secret ballot, they maintained.
The plaintiffs’ lawsuit also asks that Mitchell let disabled voters return their absentee ballots electronically, an accommodation no other absentee voter in the state is permitted. They did not include that ask in their request for the injunction after Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe testified the set-up would take months, but the demand remains in play as the judge considers the merits of the case going forward.
State Justice Department spokesperson Gillian Drummond had no immediate comment on the injunction.
Questions over who can cast absentee ballots and how have become a political flashpoint in Wisconsin, where four of the past six presidential elections have been decided by less than a percentage point.
People with disabilities make up about a quarter of the U.S. adult population, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A little more than a million Wisconsin adults, or one in four, are disabled, defined by the CDC as having difficulty with mobility, cognition, independent living, hearing, seeing, dressing or bathing.
Disabled people have engaged in several legal battles in recent years over access to the polls, as many Republican-led states have restricted how and when people can vote. Among the issues they have fought are limits on the types of assistance a voter can receive and whether someone else can return a voter’s mailed ballot.
Nearly 100,000 Wisconsin adults suffer from vision difficulties, according to statistics compiled by state health officials. A little more than 307,000 adults have difficulty moving, including difficulty walking, climbing stairs, reaching, lifting or carrying things.
Doug Poland, one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs, said he has no estimates of how many disabled people who haven’t voted in the past because they couldn’t fill out absentee ballots on their own may vote in November thanks to the injunction.
veryGood! (1292)
Related
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- BET Awards 2023: See Every Star on the Red Carpet
- Dangerous Air: As California Burns, America Breathes Toxic Smoke
- A Furious Industry Backlash Greets Moves by California Cities to Ban Natural Gas in New Construction
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- New Federal Report Warns of Accelerating Impacts From Sea Level Rise
- Judge agrees to loosen Rep. George Santos' travel restrictions around Washington, D.C.
- Only New Mexico lawmakers don't get paid for their time. That might change this year
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- Silicon Valley Bank failure could wipe out 'a whole generation of startups'
Ranking
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Let Us Steal You For a Second to Check In With the Stars of The Bachelorette Now
- The UN’s Top Human Rights Panel Votes to Recognize the Right to a Clean and Sustainable Environment
- Inside the emerald mines that make Colombia a global giant of the green gem
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Climate Activists Target a Retrofitted ‘Peaker Plant’ in Queens, Decrying New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure
- A lawsuit picks a bone with Buffalo Wild Wings: Are 'boneless wings' really wings?
- Why the Paris Climate Agreement Might be Doomed to Fail
Recommendation
'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
Alaska man inadvertently filmed own drowning with GoPro helmet camera — his body is still missing
China has reappointed its central bank governor, when many had expected a change
What to know about the Silicon Valley Bank collapse, takeover and fallout
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
The Collapse Of Silicon Valley Bank
New Florida Legislation Will Help the State Brace for Rising Sea Levels, but Doesn’t Address Its Underlying Cause
Man gets 12 years in prison for a shooting at a Texas school that injured 3 when he was a student