Current:Home > StocksFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -AssetBase
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-16 19:14:46
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (846)
Related
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- This Adjustable Floral Dress Will Be Your Summer Go-To and It’s Less Than $40
- Tupperware once changed women's lives. Now it struggles to survive
- What cars are being discontinued? List of models that won't make it to 2024
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Q&A: How White Flight and Environmental Injustice Led to the Jackson, Mississippi Water Crisis
- Kim Zolciak and Kroy Biermann Call Off Divorce 2 Months After Filing
- Shay Mitchell's Barbie Transformation Will Make You Do a Double Take
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Western Forests, Snowpack and Wildfires Appear Trapped in a Vicious Climate Cycle
Ranking
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Sky-high egg prices are finally coming back down to earth
- Two Towns in Washington Take Steps Toward Recognizing the Rights of Southern Resident Orcas
- Here’s When You Can Finally See Blake Lively’s New Movie It Ends With Us
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Duke Energy Is Leaking a Potent Climate-Warming Gas at More Than Five Times the Rate of Other Utilities
- Amazingly, the U.S. job market continues to roar. Here are the 5 things to know
- A troubling cold spot in the hot jobs report
Recommendation
North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
Here’s When You Can Finally See Blake Lively’s New Movie It Ends With Us
Texas Study Finds ‘Massive Amount’ of Toxic Wastewater With Few Options for Reuse
Just Two Development Companies Drive One of California’s Most Controversial Climate Programs: Manure Digesters
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Kim Zolciak and Kroy Biermann Call Off Divorce 2 Months After Filing
Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in trademark dispute with dog toy maker
Leading experts warn of a risk of extinction from AI