根据现有的氧化所有证据
2021年5月6日,欧盟据欧盟食品安全局(EFSA)消息,重新欧盟食品添加剂和调味剂小组( FAF )重新评估了二氧化钛(titanium dioxide )(E171)作为食品添加剂的评估品添安全性。
根据现有的氧化所有证据,不能排除该添加剂对遗传毒性的钛作担忧,鉴于存在许多不确定性,为食评估小组得出结论,加剂当E171用作食品添加剂时,全性不再被认为是欧盟安全的。部分原文报道如下:
The 重新present opinion deals with an updated safety assessment of the food additive titanium dioxide (E 171) based on new relevant scientific evidence considered by the Panel to be reliable, including data obtained with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) and data from an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity (EOGRT) study. Less than 50% of constituent particles by number in E 171 have a minimum external dimension < 100 nm. In addition, the Panel noted that constituent particles < 30 nm amounted to less than 1% of particles by number. The Panel therefore considered that studies with TiO2 NPs < 30 nm were of limited relevance to the safety assessment of E 171. The Panel concluded that although gastrointestinal absorption of TiO2 particles is low, they may accumulate in the body. Studies on general and organ toxicity did not indicate adverse effects with either E 171 up to a dose of 1,000 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day or with TiO2 NPs (> 30 nm) up to the highest dose tested of 100 mg/kg bw per day. No effects on reproductive and developmental toxicity were observed up to a dose of 1,000 mg E 171/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested in the EOGRT study. However, observations of potential immunotoxicity and inflammation with E 171 and potential neurotoxicity with TiO2 NPs, together with the potential induction of aberrant crypt foci with E 171, may indicate adverse effects. With respect to genotoxicity, the Panel concluded that TiO2 particles have the potential to induce DNA strand breaks and chromosomal damage, but not gene mutations. No clear correlation was observed between the physico‐chemical properties of TiO2 particles and the outcome of either in vitro or in vivo genotoxicity assays. A concern for genotoxicity of TiO2 particles that may be present in E 171 could therefore not be ruled out. Several modes of action for the genotoxicity may operate in parallel and the relative contributions of different molecular mechanisms elicited by TiO2 particles are not known. There was uncertainty as to whether a threshold mode of action could be assumed. In addition, a cut‐off value for TiO2 particle size with respect to genotoxicity could not be identified. No appropriately designed study was available to investigate the potential carcinogenic effects of TiO2 NPs. based on all the evidence available, a concern for genotoxicity could not be ruled out, and given the many uncertainties, the Panel concluded that E 171 can no longer be considered as safe when used as a food additive.
资料来源:食品伙伴网。如涉及作品内容、评估品添版权等问题,氧化请与本网联系删除。钛作
相关链接:食品,为食添加剂,加剂二氧化钛
相关阅读
- 六一如约而至!《哆啦A梦》2024剧场版定档5.31
- 浙江省菜篮子安全守护“四改融合”现场会在杭州建德召开
- 四川省汶川县:樱桃农药残留快速检验合格率为100%
- 建筑玻璃贴膜应该怎么贴 手机钢化玻璃膜该怎么贴,行业资讯
- 为庆贺150周年 品牌推出 Levis x New Banalce 联名鞋
- 经典的「熊猫」配色方案 这款Dunk SB联名鞋你喜欢吗?
- 玻璃楼梯扶手要怎么安装 纯玻璃楼梯具有什么特点,行业资讯
- 大米粉中镉标准物质的研制(一)
- 《哈尔的移动城堡》顶配阵容公布 蔡明肖央等加盟
- “摩卡” 的 Air Jordan 1 发售时间拉长 将在明年登场
- 跟随潮流 New Balance也推出拖鞋三配色
- Notre X Salomon 还未发售的这款联名鞋很具看点
- Crocs 与《The Simpsons》开启跨界联名
- 混凝土中氯离子检测方法研究 (一)
- 三叶草携手 NFT艺术家 FEWOCiOUS 推出全新实体NFT
- Air Jordan生肖龙主题已出 中国风拉满
- Chanel官宣新任创意总监Matthieu Blazy
- “摩卡” 的 Air Jordan 1 发售时间拉长 将在明年登场
- 光学玻璃生产工艺是什么 光学玻璃的光学是指什么,行业资讯
- 福建“市事通”平台赋能南平竹产业链高质量发展